Danique Havermans vs Venla Ahti Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do their second serve performances compare? Havermans has secured 36.54% of points on second serve, whereas Ahti has a slight edge with 42.72% efficiency in the last six months.
• In terms of returning second serves, Havermans holds a slight advantage by winning 51.35% of these points, compared to Ahti's 50.75%.
• Ahti shows superiority in returning first serves, achieving a 40.14% success rate over Havermans' 27.59%.
• Under pressure, Havermans has a stronger breakpoint-saving performance, with 57.45% effectiveness compared to Ahti's 52.53%.
• In overall match outcomes over the past year, Havermans has a winning percentage of 54.17%, outperforming Ahti who holds a 42.31% winning rate.
• Surface preferences show Havermans excels on indoor hard courts with a 54% win rate, while Ahti's strength lies on clay, where they win 41% of matches.
• When considering tournament levels, Havermans has a better win record (56.52%) in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events compared to Ahti's 44%.
• Although Ahti has faced higher-ranked opponents on average (rank 118.31) than Havermans (rank 222.63), the latter still maintains better performance metrics.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Havermans shows a marginally better record, having won 50% of such scenarios, in contrast to Ahti's 43% success rate.
• In terms of break point conversion, Ahti has shown more effectiveness, converting 33.33% of opportunities compared to Havermans' 26.32%.

Editorial Prediction (August 6, 2025, UTC):

This upcoming match sees Havermans and Ahti, two players with distinct strengths and weaknesses, going head-to-head. Although Ahti demonstrates a higher overall success in returning first serves and converting breakpoints, Havermans has a stronger breakpoint-saving ability and success in deciding sets.

While each athlete has performed primarily at the Futures/Satellites level, Havermans has managed a slightly better win rate. Their experience against lower-ranked opponents seems to contribute to their steadier gameplay.

Given these statistics, although both players have their competitive advantages, Havermans appears to have a more favorable chance of emerging as the victor in this matchup, thanks to their more comprehensive performance metrics and consistency under pressure.